In
the next verse Joel goes in to the reason why these farmers should be ashamed
in the first place. Their efforts were fruitless because an army of invaders had
destroyed their crops. The invaders were sent by God because of the nation’s
disobedience. So, to the lamentation of that situation, even the obedient
farmer was called. He was called in the same way that Dietrich Bonhoeffer was
called to lament the Nazi movement in his day, and the same way all believers
should lament the sins of their countries. Lest the confusion of current
nations and the eschatological events yet future are unwarrantedly mixed, no
one in any nation can equate the relationship of God to their nation with that
relationship He convened with the nation of Israel . So a more important
comparison arises out of the “meta-narrative” of Scripture. Just like the
Israelite of Joel’s day that was called to mourn the sin of the visible nation of Israel , all those believers after
the cross are called to mourn the sins of the visible Church. Here in verse 12 Joel called the farmers to do this
directly through his call for them to mourn the loss of their material goods.
Just like Bonhoeffer, if he had lived to see the day, would have mourned the
loss of his nation through world-wide ridicule and sanctions, the farmer who
loved God and his neighbor would have mourned the loss of Judah ’s former
blessings. Lest we get the wrong idea here, we must remember that the nation of
Jews, which included everyone who was circumcised, was guilty as a whole. So,
essentially and from a legal standpoint, no one was innocent, no matter their
faithfulness. It was not as though God had set up the Kingdom of David on Earth
to perpetuate in proposed obedience for ever, no more than God had intended
Adam and Eve to populate Eden in that first state. No, the cross was always
planned. So going back to v. 12, the prophet mentions here several types of
produce in addition to the grape. In this context the fig, pomegranate, palm
and apple don’t have special significance by themselves, but their mention in a
group is employed by Joel to indicate the totality of this calamity, as they
are routinely mentioned together (Num. and Deut.). And he ends this verse with
an astonishing logical conclusion that along with the fruits of the vine and
trees, the gladness of the people will dry up. A process that began with shame
would end with sorrow. They were called to be ashamed for the lack of their
produce but that lack was ultimately the result of the lack of their obedience.
It was not just their lack of harvest that caused them to be ashamed. They
ought to have known that it was God who brought the growth and plenty. Their
shame was finally caused by their sin which in turned caused the loss of their
produce. So Joel makes a direct connection between the removal of their
gladness, which was due to their loss of material goods, with the fact that
they had disobeyed God’s Covenant Laws. “Shame on you” he says, “…for your sin
has resulted in the sorrow you now endure because you have nothing left to be
glad about!” This last part is a metaphor of sorts. Joel had already described
the totality of the devastation by mentioning the fruits that were withered,
and at last he claimed that the fruit of their joy would wither off the tree
that was Judah .
That was the picture that his words created.
No comments:
Post a Comment