Now for a few evidences that lead me to
believe that the foe in v. 4 and in v. 6 are the same, and that this is an army
of men that Joel equates with a plague of swarming locusts. The locust plague
of v. 4 serves as an image that promoted the comprehensive nature of the
effects described in the devastation inflicted by this invader. What more can
we make of this rhetorical question asked by Joel back in verse 2? If Joel is
referring to the invasion by a literal army of desert locusts then the people
might have been tempted to answer, “Yes! We have (or our fathers have) seen
such a thing in our day!” But the way the question is posed, the answer must be
no. This debate is why the relationship of v. 5 to verses 4 and 6 is so
important: If v. 5 is an ending for the curse of verses 2-5, then one could
easily conclude that the locusts in v. 4 were literal. If v. 5 is the beginning
of the description/explanation for all of chapter 1, then the figurative
interpretation surfaces. The figurative interpretation would stand in line with
the historical fact of God’s sending of a great and terrible nation to punish
even Judah
for her covenantal disobedience. One’s interpretation relies heavily on whether
they regard v. 5 as an ending to a five verse section or as the preamble of the
passage from verse 5-7.
The infrequency with which the locusts are mentioned
when the entire book is considered is another indicator that they are not
literal. If the locusts in v. 4 are literal, assuming verses 1-5 are a separate
curse, then Joel gives very little information about the happenings surrounding
the 1st curse and virtually no introduction to the army in 6-18. The
only other mention Joel makes of locusts is in 2:25, which obviously refers
back to v. 4. All in all, that is a negligible portion of the 1st 2
chapters which he uses to proclaim the destructive force of covenantal
judgment.
The language In the ESV lists four types or
classifications of locusts are described. But if you look at the ASV or
Calvin’s commentaries, they translate these stages as a variety of bugs and
invertebrates: locusts, canker worms and caterpillars. One thing is for sure,
Joel isn’t giving the people a lesson in entomology and the four designations
are therefore not to be used to describe four types of solders or armies as has
been tried by some over zealous speculators. If the locusts are figurative then
this is simply a poetic declaration of the comprehensive nature of this
calamity. Nothing will be left. Current scientific evidence shows that the
desert locust actually has 6 stages of development. I’m not saying that this
observation alone is reason enough to abandon the literal interpretation of the
locusts in v. 4. Again, one’s orthodoxy isn’t won or lost there; scholars
within the same theological camps tend to differ. Though it is the minority
opinion, I believe Joel uses the image of locusts to describe the way an army
of men would come and leave nothing but death in their path, taking the cities
and fields by force. Farmers wielding hoes and axes and pruning hooks as
weapons were no match for a swordsman on horse or afoot; when this army in
chapter one invaded, those brave enough to try and defend their families’ lives
and freedom would simply be cut down where they stood. The people in Judah who were
not murdered would go into captivity as God had intended.
In conclusion, I believe it makes the
most sense of the chapter 1, Joel’s first oracle, to see verses 6, 10-13 as a
result of these invaders which are first illustrated in v. 4 in the image of a
swarm of desert locusts. But whether these locusts were in fact an army
themselves or whether they symbolized an army of men, Joel insures that this
was going to be a plague of special magnificence. Just like the swarms that had
ravaged the fields in the past, this army of invaders would ravage God’s Land
and His people—this is the very point. In the wake of the temporal
administration of God’s wrath against the nation’s covenantal disobedience, the
righteous along with the wicked were subject to the pain and suffering caused
by the invasion, the desolation inflicted on the Land and the exile of its
people. It is interesting to note here that, just like the Devil himself, this
army is God’s army. Look at 2:25 I will
restore to you the years that the swarming locust has eaten, the hopper,
the destroyer, and the cutter, my great army, which I sent among you.
To be sure, the invading army had their own evil motives and would likely be
punished for their actions in the future, but I believe the same could be said
of their attack and pilfering as was said of Joseph’s brothers. What they meant
for evil, God meant for good (Gen. 50:20). So the horror of an enemy’s army on
the horizon was described by Joel as an invasion of desert locusts, and the
destruction it would leave in its path was illustrated by the prolonged
destruction that would be wrought by an army of locusts.
No comments:
Post a Comment